Skip to main content

A Drama Free Approach to Selecting Deals for Your Win-Loss Reviews

win loss review questions

richardsonsalestraining30 July 2012Blog

Share on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare on Facebook

In most organisations, reviewing every won or lost opportunity is impossible. While there is so much information about each sales opportunity in your funnel readily available, there is a point of diminishing returns.

As the process owner or executive sponsor, you need to determine what’s most important and how much is “too much.”

Selecting Deals for Win-Loss Reviews

Which sales opportunities should you review? Every organisation is a bit different. We recommend setting objective criteria, such as a deal-size threshold, to help you determine which ones to review. This will help remove some of the emotion from the process. Sometimes, you want to win a project for the size or scope, to break into an industry, or to be able to work with certain high-profile companies. If your targets include winning “logo opportunities” — companies whose logos will look good on your client roster — they should certainly be an area of focus in your win-loss reviews.

But regardless of the threshold, you should include:

  • New logo opportunity wins over a certain threshold value (e.g., $100K)
  • New logo opportunity losses (outsold) over a threshold value (e.g., $100K) from any sales stage
  • New logo opportunity losses (disqualified) over a threshold value (e.g., $100K) that have entered the late stages of your sales funnel
  • Existing client opportunity losses (outsold or disqualified) over a threshold value (e.g., $75K) regardless of stage
Notice the distinction between new logo opportunities and existing customers. If you lose a deal with an existing account, then that should raise a major red flag and automatically trigger a review regardless of the stage that the deal was lost.

It is also important to distinguish between “outsold” and “disqualified” losses. Outsold implies that you’ve been beaten by a traditional competitor. Disqualified implies that you’ve been beaten by the status quo and that the prospect is not going forward with the purchase at this time or that they’ve elected to bring the work in-house. Disqualification at a late stage could imply that your rep did a poor job of qualifying the opportunity. As we mentioned, in our white paper, losing slowly is deadly. You need to review this lost opportunity to understand what’s really going on.

You can always adjust criteria to refine the process over time. However, remain dedicated and disciplined to conducting these win-loss reviews. It conveys to your clients and potential clients that you care very much about your impact on their business, and it sends a message to your sales force and the broader business that the company values good performance and is willing to invest in this process to achieve and leverage it throughout the organisation. 

Share on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare on Facebook
sales effectiveness

Richardson's Sales Effectiveness System


Resources You Might Be Interested In

agile selling skills

Brief: How Agile Sales Professionals Use Sprints to Target, Message, and Engage Prospects

Download this brief to learn how Sprint Prospecting™ enables agility that quickly gets to the core of the customer’s needs.


evidence-based solution selling training for healthcare

Brief: Engaging Healthcare Professionals with Agile Messaging

Discover three ways sellers can deliver meaningful messaging to HCPs to gain access while staying in compliance.


richardson sales performance and training company

White Paper: Accessing Growth with Sprint Prospecting

Download the White Paper, Accessing Growth with Sprint Prospecting, we offer a new set of skills designed to earn the customer’s attention.

White Paper

Solutions You Might Be Interested In