This site uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. By clicking continue you accept our use of cookies to modify the information we collect please click here.

Continue

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Contact Us
2 minute read
Back To All

A Drama Free Approach to Selecting Deals for Your Win-Loss Reviews

In most organizations, reviewing every won or lost opportunity is impossible. While there is so much information about each sales opportunity in your funnel readily available, there is a point of diminishing returns.

As the process owner or executive sponsor, you need to determine what’s most important and how much is “too much.”

Which sales opportunities should you review? Every organization is a bit different. We recommend setting objective criteria, such as a deal-size threshold, to help you determine which ones to review. This will help remove some of the emotion from the process. Sometimes, you want to win a project for the size or scope, to break into an industry, or to be able to work with certain high-profile companies. If your targets include winning “logo opportunities” — companies whose logos will look good on your client roster — they should certainly be an area of focus in your win-loss reviews.

But regardless of the threshold, you should include:

  • New logo opportunity wins over a certain threshold value (e.g., $100K)
  • New logo opportunity losses (outsold) over a threshold value (e.g., $100K) from any sales stage
  • New logo opportunity losses (disqualified) over a threshold value (e.g., $100K) that have entered the late stages of your sales funnel
  • Existing client opportunity losses (outsold or disqualified) over a threshold value (e.g., $75K) regardless of stage

Notice the distinction between new logo opportunities and existing customers. If you lose a deal with an existing account, then that should raise a major red flag and automatically trigger a review regardless of the stage that the deal was lost.

It is also important to distinguish between “outsold” and “disqualified” losses. Outsold implies that you’ve been beaten by a traditional competitor. Disqualified implies that you’ve been beaten by the status quo and that the prospect is not going forward with the purchase at this time or that they’ve elected to bring the work in-house. Disqualification at a late stage could imply that your rep did a poor job of qualifying the opportunity. As we mentioned, in our white paper, losing slowly is deadly. You need to review this lost opportunity to understand what’s really going on.

You can always adjust criteria to refine the process over time. However, remain dedicated and disciplined to conducting these win-loss reviews. It conveys to your clients and potential clients that you care very much about your impact on their business, and it sends a message to your sales force and the broader business that the company values good performance and is willing to invest in this process to achieve and leverage it throughout the organization.

 

About the Author

Richardson is a global sales training and performance improvement company. Our goal is to transform every buyer experience by empowering sellers with critical skills so they can create value to buyers and drive meaningful conversations. Our methodology combines a market proven sales and coaching curriculum with an innovative and customizable approach to learning that ensures your sales teams learn, master, and apply those behaviors where and when it matters most — in front of your customers. It’s our job to anticipate change in your industry so that your sales team can focus on fostering long-term relationships, becoming indispensable partners for their buyers.

Share:
Complimentary eBook: Win Loss Reviews - 6 Simple Steps for Better Sales Strategy Execution
Download Richardson's Sales Effectiveness System